Globalization and Communicational Differences
The role of globalization has been increasing over the last few years. One may describe this process as international integration caused by a continuous exchange of ideas and interactions among various cultures. Some scholars believe that it can be challenging because of tremendous differences between communication patterns. The issue is that levels of interdependence between people that have different backgrounds are high. Therefore, an exploration of possible barriers and implications is critical because it helps to get a better understanding of the ways in which officials may eliminate such weaknesses. The primary argument is that an increase in the number of intercultural communications associated with globalization has a positive effect on the adaptability of individuals, but do not address dissimilarities in communication between the countries. The objective of this paper is to analyze the role of communication on selected topic.
Gasparini explores the ways in which the globalization affects the perception of time and communication. One may argue that the article is outdated, but it still provides valuable insight on this subject matter. The author suggests that globalization leads to an increase in the use of modern technologies in most countries all over the globe. One should not disregard the fact that some of the devices have an enormous impact on communication between various cultures. The researcher argues that such technologies help to de-synchronize the behavior of some individuals, and it eliminates some of the differences between the cultures when it comes to communication. The problem with this argument is that the author did not expect that many industries will make enormous progress in this area, and new platforms allow incredibly high levels of diversity.
For example, it is clear that individuals from various countries use different approaches to communication on the Internet. One may alter the way he or she interacts to fit in a particular community, but it does not diminish most of the differences. It is understandable that it affects many individuals at the same time, but communication patterns in the country as a whole remain the same. Written communication is an area that plays a vital role in this case because it supports exploration of cultural differences via writing. Panina & Kroumova have explored this topic from a modern perspective. Authors of the study argue that communicational differences among the countries also have a tremendous impact on electronic communication. For instance, individuals from a high-context culture are likely to stay polite when interacting with others. They may learn how to improve their communication patterns when they gain more experience, but this type of behavior does not indicate that globalization helps to diminish associated differences. Individuals prefer to act like this because of the adaptation and a desire to fit in, but communication patterns form over the course of a person’s life. Therefore, globalization needs to have a much bigger impact to be successful at diminishing such differences.
Hu and Fan have analyzed a broad range of peer-reviewed articles about intercultural communication. Some of the findings are rather general, but presented information is valuable because it shows the progress in this area of research. Furthermore, authors of this article state that many dissimilarities between the way scholars study intercultural communication in China and other countries are currently present. Such conclusions indicate that scientists from various regions do not communicate in the same way even if they have access to the same information because of dissimilarities between the cultures. Additionally, such findings show that a person may have to deal with difficulties with the adaptation if he or she used indirect methods of communication. It is evident that a person has to interact with people from another country in real life to get a full understanding of all the dissimilarities. Nevertheless, it still does not diminish such differences because individuals learn about unique aspects of communication in a country over the course of their lives.
A study by Levine and Garland highlights the fact that a close interaction with another culture is crucial for an individual that intends to understand communicational differences. The research suggests that individuals should not have any difficulties associated with the adaptation if they focus on the examination of the surrounding environment. Oral communication is a critical area in this case because it supports an understanding of various dimensions of the culture. A desire to learn from mistakes is crucial because it allows an individual to learn via observation. However, people simply have to adapt to the environment, and will restore previous communication patterns once they return home. Moreover, it shows that most countries still have not reached a stage of globalization when it is troublesome to distinguish communicational differences between particular cultures. It is entirely possible that this limitation will not be problematic in the future, but it is unreasonable to expect such changes anytime soon.
Chang, Yuan, and Chuang have researched the relationship between international experience and an ability of individuals to adapt in a cross-cultural environment. Results of the conducted study are fascinating and suggest that the level of social involvement is a crucial factor that has an enormous influence on the process of adaptation. Such findings support the thesis statement and highlight the connection between adaptability and globalization. Additionally, authors argue that communication is one of the key factors in this case. Moreover, they state that individuals must be willing to accept ideas of others and should focus on emotional stability. Such statements signify that a person has to alter his or her behavior to maximize the efficiency of adaptation most of the time. Therefore, it is not surprising that such experience may not change the way people interact with their peers, but they are more likely to use different patterns of communication in another country.
It is evident that communication has an enormous role when it comes to discussed subject matter. Analyzed sources draw attention to the fact that it affects the way individuals perceive cultural dissimilarities and supports adaptation processes. People learn about most of the communicational differences by interacting with citizens in other countries. Levine and Garland support the idea that a person is likely to successfully adapt to a new environment if he or she does not engage in direct communication. This approach helps to analyze the differences in communication patterns between various regions. For instance, body language and eye contact are vital parts of interaction in many cultures. Furthermore, people can adjust to a particular environment when it is necessary. However, globalization has a relatively small impact on differences in communication between the countries because they have formed over many years. The most significant problem is that it can be difficult to track relationships between various factors that may have an impact on intercultural differences in communication. This aspect is rather problematic because it limits an ability of researchers to analyze various interactions and make comprehensive arguments. Nevertheless, an analysis of peer-reviewed articles suggests that most of the discussed concepts are closely connected.
In summary, presented evidence supports the thesis statement. It is evident that various areas of communication have an impact on selected topic. Examination of interactions on the Internet is vital because it shows that the culture and traditions affect the way in which people communicate even when people use the same platform. Therefore, it is not surprising that globalization fails to diminish communicational differences. Such findings are crucial because they highlight the need to explore various dimensions of this process. Overall, future research must focus on the ways in which globalization affects electronic interactions, and it is reasonable to evaluate the role of various areas of communication on communicational differences between countries.